ScholarGate
Pembantu
Latent structureItem bias and fairness

Differential Item Functioning in Educational Testing

Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis is the central statistical tool for evaluating the fairness of test items in education. An item shows DIF when examinees of equal ability but different group membership — for example by gender, race/ethnicity, or language background — have unequal probabilities of answering it correctly. By conditioning on ability before comparing groups, DIF analysis separates genuine item bias from real group differences in proficiency, and flags items for expert review before they affect high-stakes decisions.

Buka dalam MethodMindTidak lama lagiGuna, banding, dapatkan panduan
Alat & sumber
Muat turun slaid
Pelajari & terokai
VideoTidak lama lagi

Baca kaedah sepenuhnya

Ahli sahaja

Log masuk dengan akaun percuma untuk membaca bahagian ini.

Log masuk

Peta kaedah

Kejiranan kaedah berkaitan — pilih satu nod untuk meneroka.

Sumber

  1. Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 9780805809725
  2. Dorans, N. J., & Holland, P. W. (1993). DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential Item Functioning (pp. 35–66). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 9780805809725

Cara memetik halaman ini

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Differential Item Functioning Analysis for Test Fairness in Education. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ms/education/differential-item-functioning-education

Kaedah yang mana?

Letakkan kaedah ini di sebelah kaedah yang paling rapat dengannya dan baca secara bersebelahan — perpustakaan menyusun buku di atas meja; pilihan terletak pada anda.

Bandingkan secara bersebelahan

Dirujuk oleh

ScholarGateDifferential Item Functioning in Educational Testing (Differential Item Functioning Analysis for Test Fairness in Education). Dicapai 2026-06-24 daripada https://scholargate.app/ms/education/differential-item-functioning-education · Set data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026