ScholarGate
Asistents
Process / pipelinePublic bureaucracy and delegation studies

Principal-Agent Analysis in the Public Sector

Principal-agent analysis in the public sector applies agency theory to the chains of delegation that run through government — from voters to legislators, legislators to executives, and executives to bureaucracies. Terry Moe's 1984 article The New Economics of Organization brought this institutional-economics lens into the study of public bureaucracy, asking how political principals can control agents who have their own interests and superior information. The method identifies the principal and agent, specifies how their goals diverge, characterises the information asymmetry between them, and examines the control mechanisms principals use to limit agency losses. Its purpose is to explain bureaucratic behaviour and the design of oversight as the predictable result of delegation under conflicting incentives.

Atvērt MethodMindDrīzumāLietojiet, salīdziniet, saņemiet norādījumus
Rīki un resursi
Lejupielādēt slaidus
Mācieties un izpētiet
VideoDrīzumā

Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu

Tikai dalībniekiem

Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.

Pieteikties

Metožu karte

Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.

Avoti

  1. Moe, T. M. (1984). The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 739–777. DOI: 10.2307/2110997

Kā citēt šo lapu

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Principal-Agent Analysis of Public-Sector Delegation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/public-administration/principal-agent-analysis-public

Kura metode?

Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.

Salīdzināt blakus

Uz to atsaucas

ScholarGatePrincipal-Agent Analysis in the Public Sector (Principal-Agent Analysis of Public-Sector Delegation). Izgūts 2026-06-24 no https://scholargate.app/lv/public-administration/principal-agent-analysis-public · Datu kopa: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026