Comparative Public Administration
Comparative public administration is the systematic study of administrative systems across countries, regions or historical periods in order to explain similarities and differences in how states organise and run their bureaucracies. Fred Riggs, a pioneer of the field, argued in his 1964 Theory of Prismatic Society that administration cannot be understood apart from its ecological context — the social, economic, political and cultural environment in which it is embedded. The method compares administrative structures, behaviours and performance while situating each case in its setting, guarding against the assumption that arrangements which work in one country will transfer to another. Its purpose is to build generalisable knowledge about administration that is sensitive to context rather than ethnocentric.
Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu
Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.
Metožu karte
Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.
Avoti
- Riggs, F. W. (1964). Administration in Developing Countries: The Theory of Prismatic Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN: 9780395067352
- Heady, F. (2001). Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective (6th ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker. ISBN: 9780824746483
Kā citēt šo lapu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Comparative Public Administration Analysis Across Systems. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/public-administration/comparative-public-administration
Kura metode?
Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.
- Accountability Mechanism AnalysisPublic Administration↔ salīdzināt
- Collaborative Governance AssessmentPublic Administration↔ salīdzināt
- Policy Implementation AnalysisPublic Administration↔ salīdzināt
- Transaction Cost Analysis in the Public SectorPublic Administration↔ salīdzināt
Uz to atsaucas
Līdzīgas metodes
Pamanījāt kļūdu šajā lapā? Ziņojiet vai ierosiniet labojumu →