ScholarGate
Asistents
Process / pipelinePolitical cognition

Motivated Reasoning Experiment

A motivated reasoning experiment tests whether people process political information to reach conclusions they are directionally motivated to hold rather than the most accurate ones. Building on Kunda's (1990) theory and crystallized by Taber and Lodge (2006), these designs expose partisans to attitude-congruent and incongruent arguments and measure biased assimilation, disconfirmation bias, attitude polarization, and selective exposure.

Atvērt MethodMindDrīzumāLietojiet, salīdziniet, saņemiet norādījumus
Rīki un resursi
Lejupielādēt slaidus
Mācieties un izpētiet
VideoDrīzumā

Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu

Tikai dalībniekiem

Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.

Pieteikties

Metožu karte

Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.

Avoti

  1. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
  2. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480-498. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480

Kā citēt šo lapu

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Motivated Political Reasoning Experiment. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/political-psychology/motivated-reasoning-experiment

Kura metode?

Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.

Salīdzināt blakus

Uz to atsaucas

ScholarGateMotivated Reasoning Experiment (Motivated Political Reasoning Experiment). Izgūts 2026-06-24 no https://scholargate.app/lv/political-psychology/motivated-reasoning-experiment · Datu kopa: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026