Territorial Conflict Analysis
Territorial conflict analysis tests the proposition — central to the 'territorial explanation of war' — that what states fight over matters, and that disputes over territory are especially war-prone. Vasquez and Henehan (2001) operationalize this by coding disputes for the issue at stake (territory, policy, regime) and comparing how often each type escalates to war. The consistent finding that territorial disputes are more likely to lead to war than other kinds reframes the study of conflict around the contested issue rather than only the attributes of the disputants.
Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu
Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.
Metožu karte
Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.
Avoti
- Vasquez, J., & Henehan, M. T. (2001). Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816–1992. Journal of Peace Research, 38(2), 123–138. DOI: 10.1177/0022343301038002001 ↗
Kā citēt šo lapu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Analysis of Territorial Disputes and the Probability of War. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/international-relations/territorial-conflict-analysis
Kura metode?
Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.
- Dyadic Conflict AnalysisInternational Relations↔ salīdzināt
- Enduring Rivalry AnalysisInternational Relations↔ salīdzināt
- Militarized Interstate Dispute AnalysisInternational Relations↔ salīdzināt
Līdzīgas metodes
Pamanījāt kļūdu šajā lapā? Ziņojiet vai ierosiniet labojumu →