ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Zivot-Andrews strukturālās lūzuma vietas tests×Grindžera koincidences tests×
NozareEkonometrijaEkonometrija
SaimeRegression modelRegression model
Izcelsmes gads19921969
AutorsEric Zivot and Donald W. K. AndrewsClive W. J. Granger
TipsUnit root test with endogenous structural breakCausality test (F-test on VAR)
PirmavotsZivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270. DOI ↗Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumiZA test, Zivot-Andrews unit root test, endogenous structural break unit root test, ZA structural break testGranger test, GC test, predictive causality test, Granger non-causality test
Saistītās65
KopsavilkumsThe Zivot-Andrews (ZA) test is a unit root test that endogenously identifies the most likely location of a single structural break in a time series. Unlike the standard ADF test, it does not require the researcher to pre-specify when the break occurred, making it robust to data-driven regime shifts such as policy changes, financial crises, or major economic events.The Granger causality test is a statistical hypothesis test that determines whether past values of one time series help predict future values of another, beyond what that series' own past already explains. Introduced by Clive Granger in 1969, it is the standard approach for assessing predictive causality in VAR-based time-series analysis.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Zivot-Andrews Structural Break Test · Granger Causality Test. Izgūts 2026-06-17 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare