ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Simulācijas debriefinga novērtējums veselības aprūpē (DASH)×Gatavība starpprofesionālai mācīšanās skalai (RIPLS)×
NozareVeselības izglītībaVeselības izglītība
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads20061999
AutorsJeffrey W. Rudolph, Robert Simon, Daniel B. RaemerGail Parsell & John Bligh
TipsSelf-report observer-rated scaleSelf-report questionnaire
PirmavotsRudolph, J. W., Simon, R., Dufresne, R. L., & Raemer, D. B. (2006). There's no such thing as 'nonjudgmental' debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc 1(1): 49–55. DOI ↗Parsell, G. & Bligh, J. (1999). The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS). Med Educ 33(2): 95–100. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumiDASH Scale, Simulation Debriefing Assessment, Debriefing Feedback ScaleReadiness for IPL, RIPLS Scale
Saistītās44
KopsavilkumsThe DASH is a 20-item observer-rated instrument measuring the quality of debriefing—the structured, facilitated reflection following a healthcare simulation activity. Developed by Rudolph, Simon, and Raemer in 2006 at Massachusetts General Hospital, the DASH evaluates the debriefing facilitator's ability to create a psychological safety environment, elicit reflection on events, establish learning objectives, and foster insight into clinical decision-making. The scale is widely used in medical and nursing education to assess the fidelity and effectiveness of simulation-based learning experiences.The RIPLS is a 19-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure healthcare students' attitudes and readiness toward interprofessional learning and collaboration. Developed by Parsell and Bligh in 1999, it assesses three core dimensions of interprofessional readiness: teamwork and collaboration, professional identity, and recognition of roles and responsibilities across professions. The RIPLS is widely used in health professions education to evaluate the effectiveness of interprofessional education initiatives.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: DASH · RIPLS. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare