Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Regresijas diskontinuitātes dizains izglītības pētniecībā× | Diferenču starpībām (Diff-in-Diff)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Cēloņsakarību secināšana | Ekonometrija |
| Saime | Regression model | Regression model |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1960 (origination); 1999-2010 (education economics canon) | 1994 |
| Autors≠ | Thistlethwaite & Campbell (1960); popularized in education economics by Angrist & Lavy (1999), Lee & Lemieux (2010) | Card & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment) |
| Tips≠ | Quasi-experimental causal inference | Causal inference / panel regression |
| Pirmavots≠ | Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281-355. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355 |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | RDD in education, education RD design, sharp RDD education, score-cutoff design | diff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff) |
| Saistītās | 5 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Regression discontinuity design (RDD) in education research exploits a score-based eligibility cutoff — such as a test score threshold, GPA requirement, or age cutoff — to estimate the causal effect of a program, intervention, or policy on student or school outcomes. Units just below and just above the cutoff are treated as near-randomly assigned, enabling credible causal inference without a randomized trial. | Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|