Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Kvantitatīvā aprakstošā analīze× | Analīze tekstūras profila× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Pārtikas zinātne | Pārtikas zinātne |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1974 | 1968 |
| Autors≠ | Herbert Stone | Malcolm Bourne |
| Tips≠ | Descriptive Analysis Method | Mechanical Texture Method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Stone, H., Bleibaum, R. N., & Thomas, H. A. (2012). Sensory evaluation practices (4th ed.). Academic Press. link ↗ | Bourne, M. C. (1968). Texture profile of foods. Journal of Food Science, 33(3), 280-283. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | QDA | TPA |
| Saistītās | 3 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA) is a comprehensive sensory evaluation method developed by Stone and colleagues in the 1970s that uses a trained panel to describe the intensity of sensory attributes in food products. QDA provides detailed, quantitative profiles of flavor, aroma, texture, and appearance, allowing researchers and product developers to characterize and compare products objectively. | Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) is an objective, mechanical method that simulates mastication (chewing) to measure the textural properties of food products. Developed by Bourne in 1968, TPA uses a texture analyzer (a machine that applies defined forces and movements to a sample) to generate a force-time curve from which multiple texture attributes (hardness, springiness, chewiness, cohesiveness, adhesiveness) are extracted and quantified. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|