ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Filipsa-Perona (PP) vienības saknes tests×Kointegrācijas tests (Johansena / Engla-Grangera)×
NozareEkonometrijaEkonometrija
SaimeRegression modelRegression model
Izcelsmes gads19881988
AutorsPeter C. B. Phillips & Pierre PerronEngle & Granger (1987); Johansen (1988)
TipsUnit-root test for stationarityTime-series cointegration test
PirmavotsPhillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346. DOI ↗Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumiPP test, Phillips-Perron unit root test, Phillips-Perron birim kök testiJohansen cointegration test, Engle-Granger cointegration test, long-run equilibrium test, Eşbütünleşme Testi (Johansen/Engle-Granger)
Saistītās45
KopsavilkumsThe Phillips-Perron test, proposed by Peter Phillips and Pierre Perron in 1988, tests for a unit root in a time series, like the Augmented Dickey-Fuller test, but corrects for autocorrelation and heteroskedasticity in the errors non-parametrically rather than by adding lagged differences. It runs a simple Dickey-Fuller regression and then adjusts the test statistic using a long-run variance estimate, so the practitioner need not choose a lag length for the regression itself.The cointegration test examines whether non-stationary time series that each contain a unit root share a stable long-run equilibrium relationship. The single-equation residual approach was introduced by Engle and Granger (1987) and the system-based rank approach by Johansen (1988).
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Phillips-Perron Test · Cointegration Test. Izgūts 2026-06-17 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare