Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Filipsa-Perona (PP) vienības saknes tests× | Paplašinātais Dīkija-Fullera (ADF) vienības saknes tests× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Ekonometrija | Ekonometrija |
| Saime | Regression model | Regression model |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1988 | 1979 |
| Autors≠ | Peter C. B. Phillips & Pierre Perron | David A. Dickey & Wayne A. Fuller |
| Tips | Unit-root test for stationarity | Unit-root test for stationarity |
| Pirmavots≠ | Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346. DOI ↗ | Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | PP test, Phillips-Perron unit root test, Phillips-Perron birim kök testi | ADF test, Dickey-Fuller test, unit root test, Genişletilmiş Dickey-Fuller testi |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Phillips-Perron test, proposed by Peter Phillips and Pierre Perron in 1988, tests for a unit root in a time series, like the Augmented Dickey-Fuller test, but corrects for autocorrelation and heteroskedasticity in the errors non-parametrically rather than by adding lagged differences. It runs a simple Dickey-Fuller regression and then adjusts the test statistic using a long-run variance estimate, so the practitioner need not choose a lag length for the regression itself. | The Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test is the most widely used test for a unit root — that is, for whether a time series is non-stationary and must be differenced before modelling. Introduced by David Dickey and Wayne Fuller in 1979 and extended by Said and Dickey in 1984 to series with higher-order autocorrelation, it regresses the change in the series on its lagged level plus lagged differences and asks whether the lagged-level coefficient is zero. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|