ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Organizatoriskās saistības skala×Mūsdienu darba prasību un resursu skala×
NozareOrganizāciju uzvedībaOrganizāciju uzvedība
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads19912001
AutorsJohn P. Meyer and Natalie J. AllenEvangelia Demerouti and Arnold B. Bakker
TipsSelf-report questionnaireSelf-report questionnaire
PirmavotsMeyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. DOI ↗Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: state of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumiOCS, Meyer & Allen ScaleJDRS, JD-R Questionnaire
Saistītās55
KopsavilkumsThe Organizational Commitment Scale (OCS), developed by Meyer and Allen in 1991, measures three distinct dimensions of organizational commitment: affective commitment (emotional attachment), continuance commitment (perceived cost of leaving), and normative commitment (sense of obligation). This three-component model has become foundational in understanding employee retention, engagement, and organizational attachment.The Job Demands-Resources Scale (JDRS) is a multidimensional assessment instrument based on the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, developed by Demerouti and Bakker in 2001. It measures the balance between job demands (workload, time pressure, emotional demands) and resources (autonomy, support, opportunities for growth) that shape employee well-being, engagement, and burnout risk. The JDRS has become central to occupational health research and practice.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Organizational Commitment Scale · Job Demands-Resources Scale. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare