Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Ordinālās mērīšanas invariances testēšana× | Daudzgrupas apstiprinošā faktoru analīze (MG-CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1984–2011 | 1971 |
| Autors≠ | Roger Millsap; Bengt Muthén | Karl Jöreskog |
| Tips≠ | Multi-group model comparison | Measurement model / invariance test |
| Pirmavots≠ | Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1848728936 | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | ordinal MI, measurement invariance for ordinal data, ordinal CFA invariance, categorical measurement invariance | MG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA |
| Saistītās | 6 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Ordinal measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a multi-group confirmatory factor model holds equivalent measurement properties across groups when scale items are ordinal — such as Likert-type response scales. It uses polychoric correlations and categorical estimators (WLSMV/DWLS) rather than Pearson-based methods, correcting the systematic bias that arises when ordinal data are treated as continuous. | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|