ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Daudzlīmeņu svērtais izlases veids×Svērta izlase×
NozareAptauju metodoloģijaAptauju metodoloģija
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads1960s–1980s (developed alongside large-scale survey programs)1940s–1952 (formalized in large-scale government survey work and the Horvitz-Thompson estimator)
AutorsLeslie Kish (probability sampling theory); complex survey methodologistsMorris H. Hansen, William N. Hurwitz; D. G. Horvitz and D. J. Thompson (theoretical framework)
TipsProbability sampling designProbability sampling design
PirmavotsKish, L. (1965). Survey Sampling. John Wiley & Sons. New York. ISBN: 978-0471109495Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0471162407
Citi nosaukumihierarchical weighted sampling, nested weighted sampling, multilevel probability weighting, weighted hierarchical samplingprobability proportional to size sampling, PPS sampling, unequal probability sampling, importance sampling
Saistītās66
KopsavilkumsMulti-level weighted sampling is a probability-based survey design that draws samples from hierarchically nested populations — such as students within classrooms within schools within districts — and assigns design weights at each level to account for unequal selection probabilities. The resulting weighted data enable unbiased population-level inference despite the complex, non-proportional structure of the sampling frame. It is the backbone of major international assessments such as PISA and TIMSS.Weighted sampling is a probability-based design in which units are selected with unequal probabilities proportional to a known auxiliary measure of size or importance. Sampling weights — the inverse of inclusion probabilities — are applied during analysis so that each sampled unit correctly represents the population units it stands for. The approach underpins large-scale government, health, and social surveys where simple random sampling would be inefficient.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Multi-level weighted sampling · Weighted Sampling. Izgūts 2026-06-15 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare