Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Mūsdienu darba prasību un resursu skala× | Organizatoriskās saistības skala× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Organizāciju uzvedība | Organizāciju uzvedība |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2001 | 1991 |
| Autors≠ | Evangelia Demerouti and Arnold B. Bakker | John P. Meyer and Natalie J. Allen |
| Tips | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| Pirmavots≠ | Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: state of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328. DOI ↗ | Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | JDRS, JD-R Questionnaire | OCS, Meyer & Allen Scale |
| Saistītās | 5 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Job Demands-Resources Scale (JDRS) is a multidimensional assessment instrument based on the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, developed by Demerouti and Bakker in 2001. It measures the balance between job demands (workload, time pressure, emotional demands) and resources (autonomy, support, opportunities for growth) that shape employee well-being, engagement, and burnout risk. The JDRS has become central to occupational health research and practice. | The Organizational Commitment Scale (OCS), developed by Meyer and Allen in 1991, measures three distinct dimensions of organizational commitment: affective commitment (emotional attachment), continuance commitment (perceived cost of leaving), and normative commitment (sense of obligation). This three-component model has become foundational in understanding employee retention, engagement, and organizational attachment. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|