Salīdzināt metodes

	Starptautiskā medicīnas žurnālu redaktoru komitejas (ICMJE) autorības kritēriji	Recenzēšanas process
Nozare	Publicēšanas ētika	Publicēšanas ētika
Saime	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads	1978	1665
Autors	International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)	Scientific publishing community; formalized by journals and COPE
Tips	Standard	Process
Pirmavots	International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. ICMJE.	Committee on Publication Ethics (2023). COPE Guidelines: Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers. COPE.
Citi nosaukumi	ICMJE Authorship, Authorship Guidelines	Peer Reviewing, Manuscript Evaluation, Scholarly Review
Saistītās	4	4
Kopsavilkums	The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) established the most widely adopted authorship standard in biomedical research in 1978. These criteria define who qualifies as an author and distinguish authors from contributors, establishing accountability and preventing disputes over publication credit. Used by over 10,000 journals globally, ICMJE authorship criteria form the foundation of authorship practices in medical, life science, and health-related research.	Peer review is the process by which manuscripts are evaluated by experts in the same field before publication in academic journals. Reviewers assess the manuscript's scientific merit, methodology, clarity, and contribution to the field. Established in 1665 with the first scientific journal (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society), peer review remains the gold standard for quality control in academic publishing. Despite ongoing criticism and proposals for alternatives, peer review continues to filter low-quality and unethical work, though it is imperfect and sometimes slow.