ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Diferenciālā vienumu funkcionēšana (DVF)×Daudzgrupas apstiprinošā faktoru analīze (MG-CFA)×
NozarePsihometrijaPsihometrija
SaimeLatent structureLatent structure
Izcelsmes gads1970s–19931971
AutorsWilliam H. Angoff and colleagues (ETS); systematized by Holland & WainerKarl Jöreskog
TipsItem-level bias detectionMeasurement model / invariance test
PirmavotsHolland, P. W. & Wainer, H. (Eds.) (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805809589Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumiDIF, item bias analysis, measurement non-equivalence, item-level measurement biasMG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA
Saistītās56
KopsavilkumsDifferential item functioning identifies test or survey items that behave differently for examinees from different groups — such as gender, ethnicity, or language background — after controlling for the underlying ability or trait being measured. DIF analysis is essential for fairness evaluation in educational testing and psychological scale development.Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Differential Item Functioning · Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. Izgūts 2026-06-17 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare