ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Diferenču diskontinuitātes dizains×Dizains ar regresijas pārtraukumu (RDD)×
NozareCēloņsakarību secināšanaCēloņsakarību secināšana
SaimeRegression modelRegression model
Izcelsmes gads20162008
AutorsGrembi, Nannicini & TroianoImbens & Lemieux (guide to practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik (practical introduction)
TipsHybrid quasi-experimental causal design (RDD + DID)Quasi-experimental causal design
PirmavotsGrembi, V., Nannicini, T. & Troiano, U. (2016). Do Fiscal Rules Matter? A Difference-in-Discontinuities Design. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(3), 1-30. DOI ↗Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumidiff-in-disc, DiD-RDD, Süreksizliklerde Fark (Difference-in-Discontinuities)RDD, regression discontinuity design, sharp RDD, fuzzy RDD
Saistītās55
KopsavilkumsDifference-in-Discontinuities is a hybrid quasi-experimental design that fuses regression discontinuity (RDD) with difference-in-differences (DID), introduced by Grembi, Nannicini and Troiano (2016). It compares the discontinuity at the same cutoff value across two periods to isolate a causal effect.Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that identifies a causal effect by locally comparing units just above and just below a cutoff on a continuous assignment (running) variable. Formalised for applied work by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and developed as a practical framework by Cattaneo, Idrobo, and Titiunik (2020), it estimates a local average treatment effect (LATE) at the threshold.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Difference-in-Discontinuities · Regression Discontinuity. Izgūts 2026-06-19 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare