Board Interlock Network Analysis
Board interlock network analysis treats the corporate economy as a network in which two firms are tied whenever they share a director, and studies how these interlocking directorates channel information, influence, and the diffusion of practices among companies. Mizruchi's 1996 Annual Review of Sociology synthesis crystallized the field, distinguishing the determinants of interlocks from their consequences and cataloguing the mechanisms — collusion, cooptation and monitoring, legitimacy, career advancement, and social cohesion — that interlocks have been argued to serve. Davis's 1991 study of how the poison-pill takeover defense spread through the board network gave the perspective its canonical demonstration that corporate practices diffuse along director ties. The method combines two-mode-to-one-mode network construction with positional metrics and diffusion modeling.
방법 전문 읽기
무료 계정으로 로그인하면 이 섹션을 읽을 수 있습니다.
방법 지도
관련 방법들로 이루어진 인접 영역 — 노드를 선택해 살펴보세요.
출처
- Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271-298. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271 ↗
- Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 583-613. DOI: 10.2307/2393275 ↗
이 페이지 인용 방법
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Board Interlock Network Analysis (Interlocking Directorates as Inter-Firm Networks). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ko/strategic-management/board-interlock-network-analysis
어떤 방법일까요?
이 방법을 가장 가까운 동류의 방법들과 나란히 놓고 비교해 보세요 — 라이브러리는 책을 펼쳐 놓을 뿐, 선택은 여러분의 몫입니다.
- Diversification-Performance Analysis (Rumelt Categories)전략경영↔ 비교
- Merger and Acquisition Performance Event Study전략경영↔ 비교
- Upper Echelons (TMT) Analysis전략경영↔ 비교