ScholarGate
어시스턴트
Process / pipelineSocial judgment / attribution

False Consensus Paradigm

The false consensus paradigm, established by Ross, Greene, and House in 1977, demonstrates a pervasive bias in social perception: people overestimate the extent to which others share their own choices, beliefs, and behaviors. In the canonical procedure, participants indicate their own position on some issue or choice -- famously, whether they would walk around campus wearing a sandwich-board sign -- and then estimate what proportion of their peers would do the same. The signature finding is that those who choose a given option estimate that option to be more common than do those who reject it, so each group projects its own response onto others. Ross and colleagues also showed that people view their own responses as relatively common and unrevealing of personality while seeing differing responses as uncommon and diagnostic of others' traits. The paradigm became a foundational demonstration of egocentric bias in social judgment and attribution.

MethodMind에서 열기곧 제공적용, 비교, 안내 받기
도구 및 자료
슬라이드 다운로드
학습 및 탐색
동영상곧 제공

방법 전문 읽기

회원 전용

무료 계정으로 로그인하면 이 섹션을 읽을 수 있습니다.

로그인

방법 지도

관련 방법들로 이루어진 인접 영역 — 노드를 선택해 살펴보세요.

출처

  1. Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The 'false consensus effect': An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3), 279-301. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X

이 페이지 인용 방법

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). False Consensus Effect Paradigm. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ko/social-psychology/false-consensus-paradigm

어떤 방법일까요?

이 방법을 가장 가까운 동류의 방법들과 나란히 놓고 비교해 보세요 — 라이브러리는 책을 펼쳐 놓을 뿐, 선택은 여러분의 몫입니다.

나란히 비교하기

이 방법을 참조하는 항목

ScholarGateFalse Consensus Paradigm (False Consensus Effect Paradigm). 2026-06-24에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/social-psychology/false-consensus-paradigm · 데이터셋: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026