Multidimensional Loneliness Assessment
Multidimensional loneliness assessment treats loneliness not as simple aloneness but as the distressing perceived gap between the social relationships a person wants and the ones they actually have. This cognitive-discrepancy view, rooted in Robert Weiss's distinction between emotional and social loneliness, holds that the absence of an intimate attachment produces a different, qualitatively distinct loneliness from the absence of an engaging social network. Daniel Russell's 1996 psychometric work, developing the third version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale, established the measurement properties, factor structure, reliability, and validity that anchor the broader assessment tradition. The framework matters enormously for gerontology because loneliness in later life is a strong, independent predictor of depression, cognitive decline, and mortality, yet it does not reduce to objective isolation. Measuring it well requires capturing the subjective adequacy of relationships across both intimate and network dimensions. The approach gives researchers reliable, validated instruments and a clear conceptual model of what loneliness is and how it should be scored.
방법 전문 읽기
무료 계정으로 로그인하면 이 섹션을 읽을 수 있습니다.
방법 지도
관련 방법들로 이루어진 인접 영역 — 노드를 선택해 살펴보세요.
출처
- Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20-40. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2 ↗
이 페이지 인용 방법
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Multidimensional Loneliness Assessment (Discrepancy Model: Emotional and Social Loneliness). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ko/social-gerontology/loneliness-multidimensional-assessment
어떤 방법일까요?
이 방법을 가장 가까운 동류의 방법들과 나란히 놓고 비교해 보세요 — 라이브러리는 책을 펼쳐 놓을 뿐, 선택은 여러분의 몫입니다.
- Convoy Model Social Network MappingSocial Gerontology↔ 비교
- De Jong Gierveld 외로움 척도 (DJGLS)사회심리학↔ 비교
- Lubben Social Network ScaleSocial Gerontology↔ 비교
- UCLA 외로움 척도사회심리학↔ 비교