Contribution Analysis
Contribution analysis is a theory-based evaluation approach that addresses the attribution problem — establishing whether and how an intervention made a difference — without relying on an experimental counterfactual. Developed by John Mayne from 2001 onward, it works by articulating the program's theory of change, gathering evidence along that chain, and then assembling a 'contribution story' that is progressively stress-tested against rival explanations. The aim is not statistical attribution but a credible, evidence-based conclusion that the program plausibly contributed to observed results, in the face of other influencing factors.
방법 전문 읽기
무료 계정으로 로그인하면 이 섹션을 읽을 수 있습니다.
방법 지도
관련 방법들로 이루어진 인접 영역 — 노드를 선택해 살펴보세요.
출처
- Mayne, J. (2012). Contribution analysis: Coming of age? Evaluation, 18(3), 270–280. DOI: 10.1177/1356389012451663 ↗
- Mayne, J. (2001). Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: Using performance measures sensibly. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 16(1), 1–24. DOI: 10.3138/cjpe.016.001 ↗
이 페이지 인용 방법
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Contribution Analysis for Causal Inference in Program Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ko/public-policy/contribution-analysis
어떤 방법일까요?
이 방법을 가장 가까운 동류의 방법들과 나란히 놓고 비교해 보세요 — 라이브러리는 책을 펼쳐 놓을 뿐, 선택은 여러분의 몫입니다.
- Process EvaluationPublic Policy↔ 비교
- Realist EvaluationPublic Policy↔ 비교
- Theory of Change EvaluationPublic Policy↔ 비교