Causal Mediation Analysis in Politics
Causal mediation analysis decomposes the effect of a treatment — often a randomized experimental manipulation, such as a campaign message or an information treatment — into the part transmitted through a specified intermediate variable, the mediator, and the part operating through all other pathways. Formalized in the potential-outcomes framework by Imai, Keele, Tingley, and Yamamoto, it defines the average causal mediation effect (ACME) and the average direct effect, makes explicit the sequential-ignorability assumption required to identify them, and supplies a sensitivity analysis for when that assumption fails. It lets political scientists move beyond 'does the treatment work?' to 'why does it work?'
방법 전문 읽기
무료 계정으로 로그인하면 이 섹션을 읽을 수 있습니다.
방법 지도
관련 방법들로 이루어진 인접 영역 — 노드를 선택해 살펴보세요.
출처
- Imai, K., Keele, L., & Tingley, D. (2010). A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis. Psychological Methods, 15(4), 309–334. DOI: 10.1037/a0020761 ↗
- Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2011). Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 765–789. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055411000414 ↗
이 페이지 인용 방법
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Causal Mediation Analysis in Political Science (Direct and Indirect Effects of Treatments). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ko/political-science/causal-mediation-analysis-politics
어떤 방법일까요?
이 방법을 가장 가까운 동류의 방법들과 나란히 놓고 비교해 보세요 — 라이브러리는 책을 펼쳐 놓을 뿐, 선택은 여러분의 몫입니다.
- 인과적 매개 분석 (자연 직접 효과 및 간접 효과)인과추론↔ 비교
- 동적 패널 데이터 모형계량경제학↔ 비교
- 매개 분석통계학↔ 비교
- 다수준 모형연구 통계↔ 비교
- Survey ExperimentPolitical Science↔ 비교