방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 전형적 사례 표집× | 일탈 사례 표집× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 조사방법론 | 조사방법론 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1980s (systematized in Patton 1990/2002) | 1990 |
| 창시자 | Michael Quinn Patton | Michael Quinn Patton |
| 유형 | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy |
| 원전 | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 |
| 별칭 | typical case selection, modal case sampling, representative case sampling, average case sampling | extreme case sampling, outlier sampling, negative case sampling, deviant-case selection |
| 관련 | 5 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | Typical case sampling is a purposive strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that represent what is ordinary, normal, or most common within a target group. Rather than seeking outliers or the widest possible variation, the goal is to illustrate and communicate what a typical experience, program, or phenomenon looks like to stakeholders or audiences unfamiliar with it. The strategy is widely used in qualitative evaluation research and program reporting. | Deviant case sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher intentionally selects cases that are unusual, exceptional, or markedly different from the norm — outliers, extreme successes, or conspicuous failures. The goal is not statistical representation but deep learning from cases that illuminate the boundaries of a phenomenon, challenge prevailing assumptions, or reveal processes that typical cases obscure. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|