방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 삼방향 결정× | 사례 기반 추론 (Case-Based Reasoning, CBR)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 소프트 컴퓨팅 | 소프트 컴퓨팅 |
| 계열 | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2010 | 1994 |
| 창시자≠ | Yiyu Yao | Janet Kolodner; Agnar Aamodt & Enric Plaza (R4 cycle) |
| 유형≠ | Decision-theoretic classification framework | Experience-based (analogical) problem solving |
| 원전≠ | Yao, Y. (2010). Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets. Information Sciences, 180(3), 341–353. DOI ↗ | Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1994). Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications, 7(1), 39–59. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | 3WD, Trisecting-and-Acting, Tri-partition Decision Making, Üç Yönlü Kararlar | CBR, case-based reasoning cycle, analogy-based reasoning, vaka tabanlı akıl yürütme |
| 관련 | 2 | 2 |
| 요약≠ | Three-Way Decisions (3WD) is a decision-theoretic framework, introduced by Yiyu Yao in 2010, that partitions the universe of objects into three regions—positive (accept), negative (reject), and boundary (abstain)—using probabilistic rough set theory. Unlike binary classifiers that force every object into one of two classes, 3WD explicitly acknowledges uncertainty by allowing a third option: deferring judgment when available evidence is insufficient for a confident decision. | Case-based reasoning solves a new problem by retrieving similar problems solved in the past and adapting their solutions, rather than reasoning from first principles or a trained statistical model. Formalized as the Retrieve-Reuse-Revise-Retain cycle by Aamodt and Plaza in 1994 and popularized by Janet Kolodner, CBR mirrors how human experts in medicine, law, and engineering reason by analogy from remembered cases, and it learns simply by storing each newly solved case. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|