방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| TeamSTEPPS 팀워크 인식 설문지× | 의료팀 활력 도구× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 의료경영 | 의료경영 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2008 | 2015 |
| 창시자≠ | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Department of Defense, and team members from the TeamSTEPPS program | Metersky, M. L., and colleagues; based on organizational team cohesion research |
| 유형 | Self-report | Self-report |
| 원전≠ | Sorra, J., Nieva, V. F., Famolaro, T., & Dyer, N. (2014). Detailed Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Technical Report. link ↗ | Metersky, M. L., Garman, A., Li, X., & Teplitsky, M. (2015). Cohesion and teamwork in the ICU: Validation of the Health Care Team Vital Instrument. American Journal of Medical Quality, 30(1), 44–52. link ↗ |
| 별칭≠ | T-TPQ, TeamSTEPPS TPQ | HTVI |
| 관련 | 4 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | The TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) is a 35-item self-report instrument designed to measure team members' perceptions of teamwork and communication in clinical units. Developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Department of Defense, the T-TPQ was created specifically to evaluate the impact of TeamSTEPPS (Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety) training on teamwork behaviors and safety outcomes. The questionnaire assesses five core domains of teamwork: team structure, leadership, situational monitoring, mutual support, and communication. | The Healthcare Team Vitality Instrument (HTVI) is a brief, 5-item survey designed to measure healthcare team cohesion, communication quality, and shared purpose—dimensions of team "vitality" that are associated with effective teamwork and patient safety. Developed by Metersky and colleagues and validated in intensive care units and surgical units, the HTVI assesses whether team members perceive themselves as a cohesive unit with clear goals, good communication, and mutual respect. The instrument is particularly valued for its brevity (takes <2 minutes) and its ability to rapidly assess team dynamics in clinical settings where administrative burden is a barrier to survey completion. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|