방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 꼬리 위험 측정 지표 (기대 손실, 스펙트럼, 익스펙타일)× | 조건부 분위수 회귀× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | 재무학 | 계량경제학 |
| 계열 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1999 | 1978 |
| 창시자≠ | Artzner, Delbaen, Eber & Heath (coherent risk axioms); Acerbi & Tasche (Expected Shortfall) | Koenker & Bassett |
| 유형≠ | Coherent tail risk measure | Conditional quantile regression |
| 원전≠ | Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M. & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent Measures of Risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203–228. DOI ↗ | Koenker, R. & Bassett, G., Jr. (1978). Regression Quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33-50. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭≠ | expected shortfall, conditional value at risk, CVaR, spectral risk measure | conditional quantile regression, regression quantiles, Kantil Regresyon |
| 관련 | 5 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | Tail risk measures quantify the loss distribution beyond Value-at-Risk (VaR). Expected Shortfall — the expected loss given that VaR is exceeded — is the leading coherent risk measure, formalised by Artzner, Delbaen, Eber and Heath (1999) and shown to be coherent by Acerbi and Tasche (2002). Spectral and expectile-based measures generalise it. | Quantile regression models conditional quantiles of an outcome - the median, the 25th or 75th percentile, and so on - rather than the conditional mean that OLS targets. Introduced by Koenker and Bassett in 1978, it reveals how predictors act across the whole distribution, including its tails. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|