ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

계단형 쐐기 클러스터 무작위 배정 연구×이중차분법 (Diff-in-Diff)×
분야인과추론계량경제학
계열Regression modelRegression model
기원 연도20071994
창시자Hussey and HughesCard & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment)
유형Phased implementation trial designCausal inference / panel regression
원전Hemming, K., Haines, T. P., Chilton, P. J., Girling, A. J., & Lilford, R. J. (2015). The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. British Medical Journal, 350, h391. DOI ↗Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355
별칭SWCRT, SW-CRT, Stepped Wedge Designdiff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff)
관련35
요약A stepped wedge cluster randomized trial is an experimental design where clusters (e.g., schools, hospitals, communities) are randomized to receive an intervention in a phased, staggered manner over time. First formally described by Hussey and Hughes in 2007, this design combines the benefits of cluster randomization with a time-stepped implementation strategy. It is particularly useful for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in real-world healthcare and public health settings.Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 3 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial · Difference-in-Differences. 2026-06-17에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare