방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 공간 합성 통제 방법× | 공간 회귀 불연속 설계 (Spatial RDD)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 인과추론 | 인과추론 |
| 계열 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2003–2010s | 2010s |
| 창시자≠ | Abadie & Gardeazabal (2003); extended to spatial settings by subsequent applied econometric work | Popularized by Dell (2010); formalized for geographic boundaries by Keele & Titiunik (2015) |
| 유형 | Quasi-experimental causal inference | Quasi-experimental causal inference |
| 원전≠ | Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country. American Economic Review, 93(1), 113-132. DOI ↗ | Dell, M. (2010). The Persistent Effects of Peru's Mining Mita. Econometrica, 78(6), 1863-1903. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | spatial SCM, geographic synthetic control, spatial SC, spatial counterfactual control | Spatial RDD, Geographic RDD, Border RD Design, Geographic Discontinuity Design |
| 관련≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | The Spatial Synthetic Control Method adapts the classic synthetic control framework to settings where treated and donor units are defined by geographic location. By constructing a weighted combination of spatially proximate or comparable control regions, the method estimates what would have happened to a treated area absent the intervention, while explicitly accounting for geographic spillovers, spatial autocorrelation, and contiguity among units. | Spatial Regression Discontinuity Design uses a geographic or administrative boundary as the threshold that assigns units to treatment. Observations just inside one side of the boundary are compared with those just outside it, exploiting the near-random variation in treatment status near the cutoff to recover a local causal effect. The approach is widely used in economics, political science, and public health when policies or institutions change sharply at a border. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|