방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 공간 성향 점수 가중치× | 공간 회귀 불연속 설계 (Spatial RDD)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 인과추론 | 인과추론 |
| 계열 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2000s–2010s | 2010s |
| 창시자≠ | Extended from Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (2003) IPTW with spatial adaptations by Keele, Titiunik and others in geographically structured causal designs | Popularized by Dell (2010); formalized for geographic boundaries by Keele & Titiunik (2015) |
| 유형≠ | Quasi-experimental / causal inference | Quasi-experimental causal inference |
| 원전≠ | Keele, L., & Titiunik, R. (2015). Geographic Boundaries as Regression Discontinuities. Political Analysis, 23(1), 127-155. DOI ↗ | Dell, M. (2010). The Persistent Effects of Peru's Mining Mita. Econometrica, 78(6), 1863-1903. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | spatial PSW, geographically weighted propensity score weighting, spatial IPTW, spatially adjusted inverse probability weighting | Spatial RDD, Geographic RDD, Border RD Design, Geographic Discontinuity Design |
| 관련≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | Spatial propensity score weighting extends inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to settings where units are geographically located and treatment assignment may depend on spatial factors such as location, neighborhood characteristics, or spatial clustering. By incorporating spatial covariates into the propensity score model and adjusting standard errors for spatial autocorrelation, it produces more credible causal estimates from observational geographic data. | Spatial Regression Discontinuity Design uses a geographic or administrative boundary as the threshold that assigns units to treatment. Observations just inside one side of the boundary are compared with those just outside it, exploiting the near-random variation in treatment status near the cutoff to recover a local causal effect. The approach is widely used in economics, political science, and public health when policies or institutions change sharply at a border. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|