방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 공간 사건 연구 설계× | 동적 이중차분법 (Dynamic Difference-in-Differences)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 인과추론 | 인과추론 |
| 계열 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2000s–2010s | 2021 |
| 창시자≠ | Developed across applied spatial economics literature; canonical applications in Autor, Dorn & Hanson (2013) and related regional economics studies | Callaway & Sant'Anna; Sun & Abraham |
| 유형≠ | Quasi-experimental causal inference with spatial structure | Causal inference / quasi-experimental |
| 원전≠ | Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2013). The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2121-2168. DOI ↗ | Callaway, B., & Sant'Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200-230. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | spatial event study, geographic event study, spatial dynamic DiD, place-based event study | Dynamic DiD, Staggered DiD, Event-time DiD, Heterogeneous-timing DiD |
| 관련≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | Spatial event study design estimates the dynamic causal effects of a geographically concentrated shock or policy by plotting how outcomes in affected locations evolve relative to unaffected locations across time periods, while explicitly accounting for spatial spillovers and autocorrelation across geographic units. It is widely used in regional and urban economics to evaluate place-based policies, trade shocks, and local labour market interventions. | Dynamic Difference-in-Differences extends the classic DiD framework to settings where units adopt treatment at different times. Rather than collapsing all variation into a single 2x2 comparison, it estimates group-time average treatment effects for each adoption cohort at each calendar period, then aggregates them into interpretable summaries of the causal effect over event time. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|