방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 단축형 구성 타당도× | 개념 타당도× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 심리측정학 | 심리측정학 |
| 계열 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1955 |
| 창시자≠ | Multiple contributors; Smith, McCarthy, & Anderson (2000) formalized short-form validation criteria | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| 유형≠ | Validity assessment / scale shortening | Validity evaluation framework |
| 원전≠ | Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | abbreviated scale construct validity, short-form scale validation, brief scale validity, short measure construct validation | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation |
| 관련 | 6 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Short form construct validity is the systematic evaluation of whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale still measures the same underlying construct as the original full-length instrument. It combines item selection procedures with confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity tests, and criterion-related evidence to demonstrate that scale shortening has not compromised the meaning of measurement. | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|