ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

숨겨진 편향에 대한 민감도 분석 (로젠바움 경계 / E-값)×국소 평균 처리 효과 (LATE / CACE)×
분야인과추론인과추론
계열Regression modelRegression model
기원 연도20021994
창시자Paul R. Rosenbaum (bounds); Tyler J. VanderWeele & Peng Ding (E-value)Imbens & Angrist (1994); Angrist, Imbens & Rubin (1996)
유형Sensitivity analysis for causal inferenceInstrumental-variable causal estimand
원전Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467-475. DOI ↗
별칭Rosenbaum bounds, E-value, hidden bias sensitivity analysis, unmeasured confounding sensitivityLATE, CACE, complier average causal effect, Yerel Ortalama Tedavi Etkisi (LATE / CACE)
관련55
요약Sensitivity analysis for hidden bias is a family of methods that quantify how strongly an unmeasured confounder would have to operate before it could overturn a causal conclusion drawn from observational data. It was crystallised by Paul Rosenbaum's sensitivity bounds (2002) and extended by VanderWeele and Ding's E-value (2017).The Local Average Treatment Effect is an instrumental-variable estimand, introduced by Imbens and Angrist (1994) and formalised with Rubin (1996), that recovers the average treatment effect for the subpopulation of compliers — units whose treatment status is actually moved by the instrument. It is closely tied to compliance analysis.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding · Local Average Treatment Effect. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare