방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 심층 불확실성 하에서의 최악의 경우 및 최소 최대 후회 평가를 포함한 강건 시나리오 분석× | 확률적 시나리오 분석× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 시뮬레이션 | 시뮬레이션 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1950 (foundations); 2003 (modern RDM formulation) | 1955–1980s |
| 창시자≠ | Wald, A. (minimax foundation); Lempert et al. (RDM framework) | Dantzig, G. B.; Birge, J. R.; and others in stochastic programming tradition |
| 유형≠ | Scenario-based robustness evaluation | Probabilistic scenario enumeration and evaluation |
| 원전≠ | Wald, A. (1950). Statistical Decision Functions. Wiley, New York. link ↗ | Birge, J. R., Louveaux, F. (2011). Introduction to Stochastic Programming (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 9781461402374 |
| 별칭 | RSA, Robust Scenario Planning, Worst-Case Scenario Analysis, Minimax Regret Scenario Analysis | Probabilistic Scenario Analysis, SSA, Stochastic What-If Analysis, Monte Carlo Scenario Analysis |
| 관련≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | Robust Scenario Analysis evaluates a set of candidate strategies across a structured collection of plausible future scenarios and selects the strategy that performs acceptably well — or best in the worst case — regardless of which scenario materializes. It merges scenario planning with robustness criteria such as maximin, minimax regret, or satisficing to support decisions under deep, irreducible uncertainty. | Stochastic Scenario Analysis evaluates a system or decision across multiple explicitly defined scenarios, each assigned a probability of occurrence. Unlike deterministic scenario analysis, it propagates uncertainty through probability distributions and computes expected outcomes, variance, and risk metrics across the scenario space, giving decision-makers a structured view of what could happen and how likely each outcome is. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|