ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

강건 회귀 불연속성 설계×인과 추론을 위한 도구 변수(IV) 방법×
분야인과추론보건경제학
계열Regression modelProcess / pipeline
기원 연도20141990s (modern applications)
창시자Calonico, Cattaneo & TitiunikAngrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory
유형Quasi-experimental causal inferenceMethod
원전Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., & Titiunik, R. (2014). Robust Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Regression-Discontinuity Designs. Econometrica, 82(6), 2295-2326. DOI ↗Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗
별칭Robust RDD, Bias-corrected RDD, CCT estimator, rdrobustIV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation
관련43
요약Robust RDD extends the classical regression discontinuity design with bias correction and robust confidence intervals, addressing the under-coverage problem of conventional RDD inference. Developed by Calonico, Cattaneo, and Titiunik (2014), it uses local polynomial estimation with a bias-corrected point estimate and a wider variance term that accounts for the added uncertainty, yielding confidence intervals with correct asymptotic coverage.Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Robust Regression Discontinuity Design · Instrumental Variables in Health Research. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare