ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

강건한 성향 점수 가중치×인과관계에 대한 민감도 분석×
분야인과추론인과추론
계열Regression modelRegression model
기원 연도1994–20191983–2002
창시자Robins, Rotnitzky, & Zhao (foundational augmented IPW); Zhao, Small, & Bhattacharya (sensitivity-robust IPW)Paul R. Rosenbaum (hidden-bias framework); extended by Cinelli & Hazlett (omitted-variable approach)
유형Robust causal weighting estimatorDiagnostic / robustness check
원전Robins, J. M., Rotnitzky, A., & Zhao, L. P. (1994). Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(427), 846-866. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679
별칭robust PSW, robust IPW, robustness-augmented propensity score weighting, misspecification-robust weightingsensitivity analysis, hidden-bias sensitivity analysis, Rosenbaum sensitivity analysis, omitted-variable sensitivity
관련64
요약Robust Propensity Score Weighting extends standard inverse probability weighting by incorporating safeguards against misspecification of the propensity score model and extreme weights. It combines techniques such as weight trimming, overlap weighting, or augmented outcome models to ensure that causal effect estimates remain reliable even when the propensity score model is imperfectly specified.Sensitivity analysis for causality assesses how robust a causal conclusion is to unobserved confounding. Rather than assuming all confounders are controlled, it asks: how strong would an unmeasured variable need to be to overturn the estimated effect? It is an indispensable robustness check after any quasi-experimental or observational causal analysis.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Robust Propensity Score Weighting · Sensitivity Analysis for Causality. 2026-06-17에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare