ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

후향적 3상 임상시험×회고적 코호트 연구×
분야역학역학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도Late 20th century (ICH E8 1997; widespread retrospective Phase III use from 1990s onward)Mid-20th century (widely formalized 1950s–1970s)
창시자Regulatory framework codified by ICH E8/E9 (1997–1998); retrospective application developed through post-marketing and registry practiceSystematic use attributed to early 20th-century occupational epidemiology; formalized in modern epidemiological theory by Brian MacMahon and others
유형Retrospective comparative clinical studyObservational analytic study
원전Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., & DeMets, D. L. (2010). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (4th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-1441915856Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
별칭retrospective Phase III study, historical Phase III trial, Phase III retrospective analysis, retrospective comparative efficacy trialhistorical cohort study, non-concurrent cohort study, retrospective follow-up study, historical prospective study
관련56
요약A retrospective Phase III clinical trial evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of an intervention against a control using data that were collected before the study was designed. Rather than enrolling new patients prospectively, researchers analyze existing records — from registries, hospital databases, or historical trial archives — to address a Phase III-level question: does Treatment A outperform the current standard of care in a large, representative patient population? This design is used when prospective enrollment is infeasible, unethical, or when historical data are sufficiently complete to support a rigorous comparison.A retrospective cohort study assembles a group of individuals who share a common starting point and reconstructs their exposure history and subsequent outcomes entirely from pre-existing records. Because the data have already been collected before the study begins, the design is far faster and cheaper than a prospective cohort; however, the researcher must work with whatever information was recorded at the time rather than collecting purpose-built measurements.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Retrospective phase III clinical trial · Retrospective Cohort Study. 2026-06-20에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare