방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 회귀 불연속성 설계 (RDD)× | 인과 추론을 위한 도구 변수(IV) 방법× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | 계량경제학 | 보건경제학 |
| 계열≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2008 | 1990s (modern applications) |
| 창시자≠ | Imbens & Lemieux; Lee & Lemieux (modern practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik | Angrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory |
| 유형≠ | Quasi-experimental causal design | Method |
| 원전≠ | Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗ |
| 별칭 | RDD, regression discontinuity, sharp regression discontinuity, Regresyon Süreksizliği Tasarımı (RDD) | IV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation |
| 관련≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 요약≠ | Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that estimates a local causal effect around a threshold (cutoff) value, comparing units just below and just above the cutoff as if they were almost randomly assigned. It is the design developed for applied practice by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and by Lee and Lemieux (2010). | Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|