ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

실용적 무작위 임상 시험×적응형 무작위 배정 임상시험×
분야역학역학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도1967Late 1990s–2000s (widespread adoption post-2010)
창시자Daniel Schwartz & Joseph LellouchDonald Berry and colleagues; formalized by FDA guidance in 2010 and 2019
유형Interventional study designExperimental clinical trial design
원전Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗Berry, D. A. (2006). Bayesian clinical trials. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 5(1), 27–36. DOI ↗
별칭pragmatic RCT, effectiveness trial, real-world RCT, practical clinical trialadaptive RCT, adaptive trial design, response-adaptive randomization trial, adaptive clinical trial
관련66
요약A pragmatic randomized clinical trial (pragmatic RCT) is an interventional study that tests whether a treatment works under routine clinical conditions, as opposed to the tightly controlled setting of an explanatory trial. It prioritizes broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and patient-relevant outcomes to answer the question 'Does this treatment work in everyday practice?' rather than 'Can this treatment work under ideal circumstances?' The distinction between pragmatic and explanatory trials was formally articulated by Schwartz and Lellouch in 1967 and operationalized by the PRECIS tool in 2009.An adaptive randomized clinical trial (adaptive RCT) is a prospective experimental study that uses pre-specified rules to modify one or more trial aspects — such as sample size, allocation ratios, or treatment arms — based on accumulating data collected during the trial itself, while maintaining statistical validity and integrity of the study.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Pragmatic randomized clinical trial · Adaptive Randomized Clinical Trial. 2026-06-19에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare