방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 실용적 대조군 실험 설계× | 전후 검사 실험 설계× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 실험설계 | 실험설계 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1967 (seminal distinction); 2009 (PRECIS operationalization) | 1963 (formalized in Campbell & Stanley) |
| 창시자≠ | Schwartz & Lellouch (pragmatic vs explanatory distinction); extended by PRECIS framework (Thorpe et al.) | Donald T. Campbell and Julian C. Stanley |
| 유형≠ | Experimental design (pragmatic variant) | Experimental / quasi-experimental research design |
| 원전≠ | Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally. link ↗ |
| 별칭 | pragmatic controlled trial, effectiveness trial with control group, real-world control group design, pragmatic comparative design | pretest-posttest design, before-after design, pre-post design, two-wave experimental design |
| 관련≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | A pragmatic control group experimental design tests whether an intervention works under routine, real-world conditions by comparing it against a control condition — typically usual care or an active comparator — rather than a tightly controlled placebo. It prioritises external validity and applicability over the internal purity of an explanatory efficacy trial, asking whether an intervention makes a meaningful difference to people as they are actually treated in practice. | The pretest-posttest experimental design measures participants on the outcome variable before and after treatment, typically with random assignment to treatment and control groups. The difference between pre- and post-scores isolates the treatment effect from baseline variation, making this one of the most widely used frameworks in experimental and quasi-experimental research across education, psychology, medicine, and the social sciences. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|