방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 생존 연구를 위한 검정력 분석× | 시뮬레이션 기반 검정력 분석 (몬테카를로 검정력)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 통계학 | 통계학 |
| 계열 | Hypothesis test | Hypothesis test |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1981 | 2011 |
| 창시자≠ | — | Arnold et al. (2011); Green & MacLeod (2016) for mixed-model extension |
| 유형≠ | Sample size determination for survival outcomes | Simulation-based (Monte Carlo) |
| 원전≠ | Schoenfeld, D. A. (1981). The asymptotic properties of nonparametric tests for comparing survival distributions. Biometrika, 68(1), 316–319. DOI ↗ | Arnold, B.F. et al. (2011). Simulation Methods to Estimate Design Power: An Overview for Applied Research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 94. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | log-rank power analysis, cox regression power analysis, survival power analysis, Sağkalım Analizi Güç Analizi | Monte Carlo power analysis, Monte Carlo simulation power, MC power, Simülasyon Tabanlı Güç Analizi (Monte Carlo Power) |
| 관련 | 6 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Power analysis for survival studies determines how many participants — and how many observed events — are required so that a log-rank test or Cox regression has a sufficient probability of detecting a clinically meaningful difference in survival between groups. The foundational formulas were derived by Schoenfeld (1981) and Lachin (1981) and remain the standard approach in clinical trial planning. | Simulation-based power analysis estimates the statistical power and required sample size of a study by repeating a full analysis pipeline thousands of times on artificially generated data. Because it relies on Monte Carlo simulation rather than closed-form equations, it is applicable to designs — mixed models, complex measurement structures, non-standard outcomes — where analytical power formulas do not exist. The approach was systematically described for applied research by Arnold et al. in 2011, and the mixed-model implementation via the SIMR package was formalised by Green and MacLeod in 2016. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|