방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 정책 평가 성향 점수 매칭× | 역확률 가중치 (Inverse Probability Weighting, IPW / IPTW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 인과추론 | 인과추론 |
| 계열 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1983; policy evaluation adaptation 1997 | 2000 |
| 창시자≠ | Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983); Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1997) for program/policy evaluation application | Robins, Hernán & Brumback |
| 유형≠ | Quasi-experimental matching estimator | Causal inference weighting estimator |
| 원전≠ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭≠ | PSM policy evaluation, policy PSM, propensity matching for program evaluation, PSM treatment evaluation | IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting |
| 관련≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | Policy evaluation propensity score matching applies the propensity score framework — originally developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and operationalized for program evaluation by Heckman et al. (1997) — to estimate the causal effect of a policy intervention. It constructs a credible comparison group from non-participants by matching them to participants on their estimated probability of receiving the treatment, enabling unbiased effect estimation without random assignment. | Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|