ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Natural Experiment in Politics×자연 실험×
분야Political Science실험설계
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도20121990s (formal methodological articulation); earlier in epidemiology (John Snow, 1854)
창시자Dunning (design-based framework); Lee (close-election RD lineage)Varied; systematized in econometrics and political science (e.g., Meyer 1995; Angrist & Krueger 1991)
유형Observational study exploiting as-if random assignmentQuasi-experimental research design
원전Dunning, T. (2012). Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9781107698000Meyer, B. D. (1995). Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13(2), 151–161. DOI ↗
별칭Political natural experiment, As-if random design, Design-based natural experiment, Quasi-experiment with as-if randomizationnatural quasi-experiment, naturally occurring experiment, exogenous shock design, as-if randomization
관련43
요약A natural experiment in political science exploits a naturally occurring source of as-if random assignment — close elections, lotteries, arbitrary boundaries, or policy thresholds — to identify causal effects without the researcher manipulating anything. Codified for the social sciences by Thad Dunning's 2012 design-based treatment and exemplified by David Lee's close-election regression-discontinuity analysis of U.S. House races, the approach treats nature, institutions, or chance as if they had run an experiment, recovering credible causal estimates from observational data when randomization is impossible.A natural experiment exploits a real-world event, policy, or circumstance that assigns individuals to treatment and control conditions in a way that is plausibly random — or at least exogenous to the outcome of interest. Because the researcher does not control assignment, it occupies a middle ground between a true randomized controlled trial and purely observational research, offering stronger causal leverage than conventional observational designs when the as-if randomization assumption holds.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Natural Experiment in Politics · Natural Experiment. 2026-06-25에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare