방법 비교

	COPRAS-IN	Analytic Network Process (피드백 및 상호 의존성을 포함한 AHP)	복합 비례 평가
분야	의사결정	의사결정	의사결정
계열	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
기원 연도	2019	1996	1996
창시자	Şahin, R.	Saaty, T. L.	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.
유형	Interval Neutrosophic ranking — INN: <[T_L,T_U],[I_L,I_U],[F_L,F_U]> with 0 ≤ T_U+I_U+F_U ≤ 3	Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)	Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)
원전	Şahin, R. (2019). COPRAS Method with Neutrosophic Sets. Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making Using Neutrosophic Sets, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 369, Springer, Cham	Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65
별칭	—	—	—
관련	7	8	8
요약	N-COPRAS (COPRAS-IN — COPRAS with Interval Neutrosophic Numbers (INN)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Şahin, R. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.