방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 다집단 검사-재검사 신뢰도× | 다집단 확인적 요인분석 (MG-CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 심리측정학 | 심리측정학 |
| 계열 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1979–2000 | 1971 |
| 창시자≠ | Systematic multi-group extensions developed alongside measurement invariance frameworks (Vandenberg & Lance, 2000); intraclass correlation foundation in Shrout & Fleiss (1979) | Karl Jöreskog |
| 유형≠ | Reliability estimation across groups | Measurement model / invariance test |
| 원전≠ | Shrout, P. E. & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. DOI ↗ | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | multi-group temporal stability, cross-group test-retest reliability, group-comparative retest reliability, multi-sample temporal consistency | MG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA |
| 관련≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Multi-group test-retest reliability evaluates whether a measure produces stable scores across time separately for two or more defined groups — such as different genders, age cohorts, or clinical populations — and determines whether the degree of that temporal stability is equivalent across those groups. | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|