ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

다집단 판별 타당도 평가×판별 타당도×
분야심리측정학심리측정학
계열Latent structureLatent structure
기원 연도1981 (foundational criterion); multi-group extension 1990s–2000s1959
창시자Fornell & Larcker (for the AVE-based criterion); extended to multi-group settings by the SEM invariance literatureDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
유형Validity assessment / model comparisonValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
원전Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
별칭cross-group discriminant validity, multi-sample discriminant validity, MGDV, discriminant validity across groupsdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
관련55
요약Multi-group discriminant validity assessment tests whether constructs measured by a scale are empirically distinct not just in one sample but consistently across two or more groups (e.g., cultures, genders, age cohorts). It extends standard discriminant validity criteria — such as the AVE rule and the HTMT ratio — into a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework to verify that conceptual distinctness is replicable across subpopulations.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Multi-group discriminant validity · Discriminant Validity. 2026-06-17에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare