ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

메타분석 경쟁 위험 분석×메타분석 생존 분석×
분야역학역학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도2000s–2010s (formalized as a pooled approach)1990s–2000s (formalized ~1998)
창시자Based on Fine & Gray (1999) competing risks framework; meta-analytic synthesis methods established through methodological literature (mid-2000s onward)Parmar, Torri & Stewart (statistical framework); broader IPD tradition developed by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group
유형Systematic review / meta-analysisQuantitative synthesis / meta-analytic method
원전Riley, R. D., Hayden, J. A., Steyerberg, E. W., et al. (2013). Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor Research. PLOS Medicine, 10(2), e1001380. DOI ↗Parmar, M. K. B., Torri, V., & Stewart, L. (1998). Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Statistics in Medicine, 17(24), 2815–2834. DOI ↗
별칭meta-analysis of competing risks, pooled competing risks analysis, systematic review competing risksmeta-analysis of time-to-event data, pooled survival analysis, IPD survival meta-analysis, aggregate survival meta-analysis
관련54
요약Meta-analytic competing risks analysis pools results from multiple primary studies that each used a competing risks framework, allowing summary estimates of cause-specific or subdistribution hazard ratios and cumulative incidence functions. Because standard meta-analytic methods may misrepresent competing events, specialized pooling strategies are required that respect the subdistribution hazard structure introduced by Fine and Gray and the distinction between cause-specific and all-cause hazard models.Meta-analytic survival analysis is a quantitative synthesis method that pools hazard ratios and related time-to-event statistics from multiple independent studies to produce a single, more precise estimate of a treatment or exposure effect on survival outcomes such as overall survival, disease-free survival, or time to relapse. It can operate on aggregate published data or on individual patient data (IPD) contributed directly by study investigators.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Meta-analytic competing risks analysis · Meta-analytic survival analysis. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare