방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 최대 변이 표본 추출× | 전형적 사례 표집× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 조사방법론 | 조사방법론 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1985 (Lincoln & Guba); elaborated 1990–2002 (Patton) | 1980s (systematized in Patton 1990/2002) |
| 창시자≠ | Lincoln & Guba; systematised by Michael Quinn Patton | Michael Quinn Patton |
| 유형 | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy |
| 원전≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage. Chapter 5: Purposeful Sampling. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 |
| 별칭 | maximum variation sampling, maximum diversity sampling, MVS, heterogeneous sampling | typical case selection, modal case sampling, representative case sampling, average case sampling |
| 관련 | 5 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | Maximum variation sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that span the widest possible range of variation on dimensions central to the study. The goal is not statistical representation but the identification of common patterns that cut across diverse cases as well as the documentation of the unique ways each context shapes the phenomenon under investigation. | Typical case sampling is a purposive strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that represent what is ordinary, normal, or most common within a target group. Rather than seeking outliers or the widest possible variation, the goal is to illustrate and communicate what a typical experience, program, or phenomenon looks like to stakeholders or audiences unfamiliar with it. The strategy is widely used in qualitative evaluation research and program reporting. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|