ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

짝짓기 선별 검사 평가×중첩 환자-대조군 연구×
분야역학역학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도1980s–2000s (formalized alongside diagnostic accuracy methodology)1973–1977
창시자Methodological synthesis from matched case-control and diagnostic accuracy traditions (Pepe, Zhou, and others)Nathan Mantel (1973); D. C. Thomas (1977 formalization)
유형Observational diagnostic study with matched designHybrid observational study design
원전Pepe, M. S. (2003). The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198509844Thomas, D. C. (1977). Addendum to: Methods of cohort analysis: Appraisal by application to asbestos mining. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 140(4), 469–491. link ↗
별칭matched diagnostic accuracy study, paired screening evaluation, matched-pair test performance study, matched screening assessmentNCC study, nested CC design, case-control within cohort, density sampling case-control
관련66
요약Matched screening test evaluation assesses the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of a screening or diagnostic test using a matched design, in which disease-positive cases are paired with one or more disease-free controls selected to share key characteristics such as age, sex, or clinical setting. Matching controls for confounders before measuring test performance produces more precise and less biased estimates of diagnostic accuracy, and enables direct paired comparisons of competing tests within the same subjects.A nested case-control study is an efficient observational design embedded within a defined cohort. For each participant who develops the outcome of interest (a case), a small number of matched controls are sampled from those still at risk at the same point in time. This density-sampling strategy yields odds ratios that approximate incidence-rate ratios from the full cohort at a fraction of the data-collection cost — making it the preferred alternative when measuring exposures for all cohort members would be prohibitively expensive or technically demanding.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Matched Screening Test Evaluation · Nested case-control. 2026-06-15에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare