ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

기계 학습 증강 패널 사건 연구×이중차분법 (Diff-in-Diff)×
분야인과추론계량경제학
계열Regression modelRegression model
기원 연도2019-20211994
창시자Chernozhukov, Wuthrich & Zhu; Freyaldenhoven, Hansen & Shapiro (parallel developments)Card & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment)
유형Causal inference / quasi-experimentalCausal inference / panel regression
원전Chernozhukov, V., Wuthrich, K., & Zhu, Y. (2021). An Exact and Robust Conformal Inference Method for Counterfactual and Synthetic Controls. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 116(536), 1849-1864. DOI ↗Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355
별칭ML-augmented event study, ML event study, panel event study with ML, machine learning event studydiff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff)
관련35
요약The machine learning-augmented panel event study extends the classical panel event study by replacing or augmenting parametric counterfactual models with machine learning estimators — such as LASSO, random forests, or matrix completion — to construct more accurate pre-event baselines, detect violations of parallel trends, and produce valid causal effect estimates across multiple post-event periods.Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Machine Learning-Augmented Panel Event Study · Difference-in-Differences. 2026-06-15에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare